Revelation Study

A studyRevelation Study: Chapter 4jStark3

Link to additional PowerPoint Notes                               Revelation 4 & beyond

Chapter 1 of Revelation is about the past; chapters 2 and 3 are about the present. (John’s Day) From Revelation chapter 4 through 22 it is all about the future; the Tribulation and the 2nd advent of Christ. Recall that the seven churches in chapter 2 and 3 are Messianic churches of John’s time. The guidance offered in each letter also is for one wanting to live a Christ-like life; one that is approved of God.

We have completed our in-depth study of the seven churches, now we see the door of heaven opened (4:1). Some believe and I can appreciate their view that this verse is also a parallel to the Rapture. If this is so, we will see or live through chapters 1 to 4:1 then taken up to meet Jesus in the clouds in the rapture.

When a Christian dies, his or her soul and spirit goes to be with Christ, that is, in heaven (2 Corinthians 5:8; also see Revelation 21:3-4). Our body remains in the grave until the resurrection of those who died in Christ (rapture). Later, those who die(d) without Christ will stand judgment at the Great White Throne after the Millennial Reign of Jesus in Jerusalem. For the Christian, judgment is at the end of the Church/gentile age, just before the Tribulation… the *Bema Seat Judgment of rewards. This is one reason I suggest locating events like the Rapture at this spot in the book of Revelation (4:1-2). There are at least 4 or 5 reasons for identifying it here.

*Bema Seat Judgment is often referred to as Christ’s Judgment Seat of Christians. This is the judgment of “the good and the bad done in the body”. This includes our promised rewards (II Thessalonians 2:19-20; Revelation 22:12; II Corinthians 5:9-10)

  1. The location or timing of this event as recorded in Revelation 4 is right for the Rapture. Chapters 4 & 5 present a vision in Heaven. Chapter 6 introduces the Tribulation period. John, the last of the 12 disciple of Jesus who was still alive, is a fitting symbol of the Church being taken out of the world just before the Tribulation begins. “Since you have kept my command to endure patiently, I will also keep you from the hour of trial that is going to come upon the whole world to test those who live on the earth“. (Rev. 3 v.10)
  2. The absence of any mention of the Church in the rest of Revelation indicates that it is no longer on earth during the Tribulation. There are 16 references to the Church in Rev. 1-3, whereas chapters 6-18, which cover the Tribulation, do not mention the Church once. Chapters 4 and perhaps 5 are departure chapters.
  3. The extensive use of *Old Testament language and symbols in Chapters 4-18 is an indication of Israel issues, not Church concerns or issues. This is understandable since the Church Age is the time of the Gentiles and that ends with the rapture. The Great Tribulation is the time of Jacob’s trouble also called the seventieth week of Daniel. Our Daniel bible study pointed this out. End Time is reserved by God for His final dealings with Israel. Some of these Old Testament symbols found in Revelation include the Tabernacle, the Ark of the Covenant, the altar, elders, censers, cherubim, seals, trumpets, and *plagues. *just as it was so of Israel in Egypt prior to their exodus from bondage and headed to their Promised Land so it will be at the rapture when Christians are taken to their Promised Land… Heaven.
  4. There is similarity between the events of Revelation 4 v.1-2 and other scriptural teaching on the Rapture, such as 1 Thess. 4 v.13-18.
  5. Perhaps another connection with the rapture is the fact that there are similarities with it and John’s many identities: A son of Thunder (God’s wrath poured out), John the beloved of Christ (as is His Church), and John was a part of Jesus’ inner circle of disciples plus, his name in Greek means “Jehovah is gracious.” So will Jesus be gracious by the rapture of His church BEFORE the Great Tribulation.

* JIV, the church age ends in chapter 3 with the messages to the 7 churches. It is now all Jewish (ick) history yet to happen.

None of the above reasons is sufficient in and of their individual selves to suggest that Revelation 4 v.1-2 refers to the Rapture of the Church. When, however, all of them are considered together, I am inclined to believe that this inference is possible if not probable. The Rapture of the Church is not explicitly taught in Rev. 4 but definitely appears logically and chronologically correct being at the end of the Church Age and before the Tribulation.

The 7 churches were ALL Messianic-Christians; established by former Judaism followers via Paul and Peter. From chapter 4 forward, the intent of Revelation is to explain and inform God’s chosen of the Tribulation i.e. Jesus revealed. It is not far-fetched to accept that this is a Rapture passage for the church then comes a time when the Israelites will finally recognize their messiah.

John is the seer and is writing about future events even in his day. What better way to allude to the Rapture at this specific time, particularly since it is located right after the description of the Church Age and just prior to the revelation of the Antichrist. Remember that John is called to heaven to witness these things, just as the church rapture will call believers to heaven and ‘perhaps’ witness these things yet to come.

I find it both comforting and definitive doctrine when I read Matthew 24:31 that the Book of Revelation is in reference to the reunited Nation of Israel and not the church: And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect (Eklektos: by implication; his favorite, chosen, elect; Israel) from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other (ESV). This may be the very same trumpet blast that calls Christians home to Heaven; rapture. Israelis will gather in Israel so that prophecy can be fulfilled when the nations of the world align themselves against *Jerusalem (*symbolic name for Israel and Israelis). To be fair, this verse could also mean the Christians from the four corners of the earth. I question this conclusion though because we are called to meet Christ in the clouds at the twinkling of an eye. No call goes out… just a meeting in the sky. (1 Thessalonians 4:16 & 17. Also see 1 Corinthians 15:52)

JIV: 4:17b states, “…and so ‘we will be with the Lord forever.’” If the Lord here is referring to Jesus Christ, this highly suggests we will return to earth with Him during His 1,000 year reign. We will be WITH HIM forever!

Also, look again at the opening words in verse 17. “After that, we who are still alive AND LEFT….” This specifically identifies those Christians who are left; i.e. those in Christ, not the entire world’s population. If it only read, “those who are still alive” it becomes a universal rapture of everyone. This just isn’t true. The Great White Throne judgment is their destiny.

On a third JIV (Jim’s Introspective View) note, the use of the word “behold” in Revelation 4:1 is an imperative. As a noun it would mean an essential or urgent thing. As an adjective it would be vitally important; crucial. This means Revelation 4:1 is a crucial turning point in what John sees. The Rapture???? The Tribulation!!!!! This is not a ‘behold’ that simply means to observe or look.

Might it also be feasible that the words “come up here for I have things to show you that are yet and must happen” will be true of the immediate 7 years after the rapture, things that are yet and must happen? Will we be able to see the rest of Revelation played out prior to the millennial reign but from the safety of heaven? This is something to think about, right? Don’t be too quick to conclude.

In Revelation 4:2 we read “in the spirit”. In the Greek this is πνεῦμα/pneuma. At first glance one might assume in the spirit means ‘apart from the body’. However, pneuma can also mean a mental disposition; a current of air. ONLY figuratively it means a spirit as one might conclude at first glance.

In Revelation 4:3 we once again see support for the Israel specificity of this book. It can easily be missed. John describes, in part, 4:3a “And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone…”

 

Look at the two stones; jasper and sardine. What is their significance? They are the first and last stones in the breastplate of the High Priest. Why they are listed in reverse order, jasper (last stone) then sardine/odem/ruby (first stone), I do not quite grasp. Its significance may have something to do with ‘the last will be first and the first last’ (Matthew 19:30; 20:16). It may have something to do with reading Hebrew right to left. PS: Odem is also identified as sardine or ruby. Each name identifies the same stone. Also, Reuben (Sardine stone) was the first born and Benjamin (Jasper stone) the last born. Another symbolism: God is the alpha and the omega. Possibly in that the jasper is the last stone, this is significant in that this is also “the last straw” in God’s timetable for His created earth. The End of Time is then upon us? Remember that “time” itself is a creation of God (Trinity) back in Genesis 1:4.
breastplate stones

 

Read right to left, top to bottom:
Reuben or the sardine stone is 1st. Benjamin or the jasper stone is listed last.

 

 

It would be easy to get lost in discussing the meanings of the different parts of the High Priest’s garb, but I will fight the temptation and stay in Revelation… (for now:).

Per the rainbow identified in Rev 4:3 we should be reminded of the covenants between God and Israel (his elect and chosen people; O.T.) and the Church (New Testament time of the gentile). After the deluge of Genesis 6-9, God made a covenant with ALL MANKIND; the rainbow covenant/promise. We find God beneath the rainbow council of elders John sees is seated in a semi-circle around the Great Throne in Heaven.

I hasten to take us back to the study of Bible Codes in a previous study and the meaning of each name within the Tribes of Israel; Reuben to Benjamin in birth order:

J.I.V. Reuben: Behold, a son will be born; He will love me but he will be unloved. Simeon: He has looked upon my affliction; He has seen my sin. Listen and obey him. Levi: Be joined together; share the Word of God over a great distance. Judah: Give praise to Yhwh, give thanks and confess sin [or] Dan: be judged of God. Naphtali: To struggle within [brings] self-inflicted wounds. Be swift. Gad: As a troop HE will come and prevail. Asher: [Be] blessed, happy in your good fortune. Dan: Be discerning in judgment, Issachar: There is a reward from God; Zebulon: a gift (zebed) or position of honor from God; (yizbeleni), redemption. [You will] Be paid your wage, be exalted. Your sins will be forgotten; Joseph’s two sons… Manasseh: forgetting the past; Ephraim: double will be your fruitfulness in this land of affliction; Benjamin: you will be on the right side of the Most High.

WOW! How much more direct need God be in His Holy Word and the direction he gave to His chosen people (and the church) via their very names put together as HIS statement and how things on earth will eventually end up. Note that there are 13 tribes as Joseph’s two sons added to the 11 brothers of Joseph equals 13.

JIV HUH moment. Might I be venturing too far off the coast of reality and the safe haven of the beach to think about the 13 original colonies; the 13 stars and stripes on our original flag; the war of separation between the North and the South with a President in both territories; the dollar bill with a pyramid on the left and a faint Star of David with 13 stars within it on the right; the fact that the eagle holds 12 arrows in its left claw and an olive branch in its right claw; the fact that the original colonies were semi-independent with State powers (confederacy) just as were the tribal territories of Israel under the judges; the fact that manifest destiny; i.e. predestination was the undercurrent driving American policy and philosophy per settlement of this land; that America was founded upon Christian principles and has now drifted far away?

Again, after chapter 3, the Book of Revelation is a pronouncement and revelation for and warning to the Nation of Israel, not the church. Perhaps the above possible bible code using the definitions, meanings and expressions of the 13 Tribes of Israel nails it as Revelation being about and for Israel AND the church.

The Kingdom in Your Midst

The Kingdom in Your Midst – Luke 17:20-25 (This is in response of research to answer an email question I received from “Angela.”) 

jStark3Much of what I write below is borrowed from Dr. Ralph F. Wilson. He is an active member of a denomination, [but] he believes in the essential unity of all believers in Jesus the Lord and is non-sectarian in his approach. I am nondenominational in thought, study, belief and ordination.

Angela: I am in a bit of a quandary of how to address Mr. Whitelaw’s suppositions. The best I can do without going into a very long dissertation and losing you with explanation after explanation… well, my experience has been when asked a deep, substantial and substantive question like yours regarding my thoughts per anyone or theological question is to answer your question without great detail as to why, but only after I have done a bit of pre-study and research myself.

Therefore I am choosing ONE of his positions in his book; he has over 20 published books and pamphlets. Point # 7 at the webpage http://www.docstoc.com/docs/38288150/The-Gospel-Millenium:

Mr. Whitelow appears to be a-millennial; i.e. no millennium; that is, no 1,000 year reign of Christ on earth. His position fits well with the doctrinal plank of some mainstream denominations’ belief in predestination meaning only those who are pre-elect will have a place in heaven including being a-millennial. Both positions are weak. I go into greater detail about these two positions in one of my articles in ahabiblemoments.com. Suffice it to say, predestined simply means that ONCE one becomes a follower of Jesus Christ, s/he is predestined to be saved at the 2nd advent; i.e. rapture, not Left Behind (16 book series by Jenkins and Lahaye)

The Jews believed that the promised Messiah of the Old Testament would come with great outward show and establish an earthly kingdom from which the world would be ruled AT THAT TIME. Jesus, the promised Messiah, told the Pharisees in this passage that He did not come to establish an earthly, physical kingdom as they thought; one that people could observe with the eye at that time in history. To the contrary, He came to build the Christian church and body of believers (Matthew 16:16-19). I was to be a spiritual kingdom; The passage Luke 17:20 THROUGH V37 really must be considered together. When we separate the pieces it runs the risk of missing the point and “not seeing the forest for the trees.” This passage has too many details to include in answering your question per Mr. Whitelaw, Angela. be studied in one lesson.

One other comment: Evangelical Christians have a way of fighting over their various cherished views of the End Times. We need to agree to learn from one another but not be dogmatic in the way we present our views unless scripture is absolute. We’re here to understand what our Lord Jesus teaches. Let’s not try to make everything fit some systematic eschatology at this point; later maybe. For now let’s catch what Jesus is saying to us; when we opt to follow Christ, then 1 Corinthians 6:19 comes into play, long before the Millennial Kingdom that is primarily focused upon Israeli’s; not just Jews, but all Tribes of Israel minus the Tribe of Dan. The church rapture will happen before (pre), during (mid) or (post) following the Great Tribulation; i.e. the church being the body of Believers in Jesus Christ.

Exposition (i.e.: clarifications)

Mr. Whitelow’s Baptist, Reform, Nazarene, Church of God denominational plank of no millennial reign, in my opinion, is strong in spiritualization of scripture and weak in direct (literal) interpretation of scripture. In this Luke 17 passage, Jesus’ teaching turns to the coming of the Kingdom of God. The Pharisees ask “when” the kingdom will come (17:20). Jesus explains to his disciples “how” it will come (17:22-35). And finally Jesus teaches “where” it will come. Jesus’ teaching isn’t full and detailed here. The Pharisees anticipate(d) a kingdom on earth during their time since this Christ guy claimed to be the Son of God. Otherwise this made Jesus Christ a false prophet in their opinion. They were looking to shake off Roman paganism and rule putting the Pharisees in charge and back in power. They failed to see the inward kingdom (bodies being the Temple of the Holy Spirit) first. There is a topic in scripture called the “Time of the Gentiles.” It fits here but is too much for one e-note you and for anyone to be expected to grasp in one gulp.

I know there are many eschatological views. (“Eschatology” means a study of the end times. We are strongly tempted to look at Jesus’ words and try to wedge them into our eschatological chronology. (How’s that for big words?) That is, an explanation that fits one’s preferred end time but that wasn’t what Jesus expected his disciples to do. He wanted to teach them about the NATURE of his coming, not the TIMING.

Jesus wanted to teach them about the NATURE of his coming, not the TIMING.

Jesus wanted to teach them about the NATURE of his coming, not the TIMING.

When Will the Kingdom Come? (17:20a)

Jesus begins his teaching with a question from the Pharisees.

“Once, having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come….” (17:20a)

Why would the Pharisees ask this? What did they believe about the Kingdom? We have no documents from Jesus’ day that tell us what the Pharisees believed about the end times. We know, however, that a Pharisee named Sadoq (Shadow: Colossians 2:17) was involved in founding of the Zealot party, apparently from an older wing of the Pharisees. Judas the Galilean, a leader of the Zealots was considered by some the messianic heir-apparent. The Pharisees seem to be involved in the ferment or uproar of messianic expectancy that made First Century a volatile place for Roman rulers to keep under control. The Pharisees are quizzing Jesus, trying to find out his own expectation, perhaps prodding him to see if he’ll claim to be the messiah. They ask “when” the Kingdom of God will come. This could in and of itself [my opinion], be very self-serving.

Like many of Jesus’ responses to the Pharisees’ trick questions he says that they are asking the wrong question because they don’t understand the nature of the Kingdom.

“Jesus replied, The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, nor will people say, “Here it is,” or “There it is“….’ ” (17:20-21a). In short, when Jesus returns to establish his “…Kingdom [to] come…” (Lord’s prayer); [Rom 14:11] For it is written, “As I live, says the Lord, every knee will bow to me, and every tongue will praise God.” Rom 14:12 So each one of us will give an account concerning himself.

Angela: I am now doing what I promised both you and me, to not do; get into such detail it becomes difficult to understand, follow and sounds like a Sunday School lesson.

Your question per Mr. Whitelow and my current understanding of him and his writings… I suggest that there are better resources even though he is quit scholarly and knowledgeable. He sticks very closely to a denominational line (Baptist? Reform? Nazarene? Church of God?) that being one of the reasons I opted many years ago to do my theological study outside of any one particular denomination reading many authors and theologians concluding what my heart and prayer tells me is truth.

Why I believe that there will be a full restoration of Israel (not just the Jews which means “from the Tribe of Judah” ignoring the other 11 Tribes of Israel); i.e. during the Millennial reign of Jesus from Jerusalem:

(Gen. 15:18, Isa. 10:21-22, 19:25, 43:1,65:8-9, Jer. 30:22, 32:38, Eze. 36:1-48:35, 43:24, 30-31, Mic. 7:19-20, Zech. 13:9, Mal. 3:16-1; only to mention a few)

The New Egyptian Kingdom Era

conncect the dotsThe New Egyptian Kingdom Era (around 1500 B.C. to 1070 B.C.)

JIV: “He who only studies parts of history will fail to connect the dots of history revealing the larger picture and fuller truth.”jStark3

Those who are Middle East enthusiast like I are likely to also be Old Testament buffs. The Old Testament (O.T.) is about Israel of old: God’s covenants with them, their failure to stay in God’s will, the consequences for falling away and the critical parallel of O.T. Israel and New Testament (N.T.) church. The promises made to God’s chosen people are unique to them. Jesus had not yet paid the debt of Adam’s sin. This is the N.T. facts. God will keep His covenants, Old Testament and New Testament.

This may be a poor parallel, but when we make a promise to someone that in no way means this is also a promise to the guy or gal next door. This is the difference between the O.T. and the N.T.; God’s covenants with Israel and His covenants with the N.T. church/Christian. However, it is not beyond simple thought that we can learn from others including keeping promises; i.e. God keeps his covenants. Deuteronomy 7:9; II Peter 3:2.

PS: I will let the reader make his or her fingers do the walking here and examine the scriptures per what I just stated. I stand on His promises.

Back to the topic of today’s research:

What archeologists and historians identify as the New Kingdom Era of Egypt is also a parallel with the Exodus (book of) of Israelis in Egypt during a 400 year dwelling or slavery within this land. For a reasonably good brief on this history go to http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/306324/Joseph

The end of Jacob’s descendants Israel, dwelling in Egypt and the New Kingdom of Egypt beginning is almost harmonious in facts. A bit of knowledge is needed here. Egypt of old was often two different kingdoms on the Nile River. There was the upper and lower Egypt, two distinct kingdoms and just as often… an Egypt as we know it today; one country. For a fairly good secular fact sheet, I encourage the reader go to http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?ParagraphID=aqi. This website is somewhat exclusive history rather than inclusive, but one can glean overlapping dates of the time within which Israelite dwelt in Egypt, the fall of the Egyptian pharaoh (Red Sea incident) and their departure (Exodus 19:1) toward God’s Promised Land (sometime around 1400 B.C.).

It is also critical for the serious minded Bible and/or history buff to know there are two very different Ramses eras. Establishing when Jacob/Israel moved his family to Egypt due to famine in the Middle East, we need to do some small math. The first king of Israel was Saul from the Tribe of Benjamin. This was around 1040 B.C. Now back up a bit. The judges ruled Israel approximately between 1450 B.C. and to around 1043 B.C. About 400 years. Acts 13:17-20 states it was 450 years. Again, let your fingers do some walking and study this for yourself. But, add 400 plus years to the beginning of King Saul’s reign as King over Israel, we get: 1040 + 400 = 1450ish. Now look back at the turmoil and problems in Egypt at this time when they flip-flopped between a northern kingdom, a southern kingdom and a united Egyptian Kingdom.

Abram’s birth: 2166 BC
Isaac’s birth (when Abram was 100): 2066 BC
Jacob birth (when Isaac was 60): 2006 BC
*Jacob’s Migration (when he was 130): 1886 BC (subtract 450 years living in Egypt as slaves to the Egyptians, we come to around 1430; a very close date to this discussion of overlapping histories of Egypt’s kingdom problems and the exodus of the Israelites.

Joseph’s age at the time: 37
(17 when sent to Egypt as a slave; 30 when raised to 2nd ruler in the land; 7 years of plenty + 2 years of famine = 37)

Check these scripture: Gen 21:2; 25:26; 27:28; 45:6; 47:9; 50:22

*About this same time, and probably due to the same famine issues in the Middle East, the Hyksos started a similar migration into Middle and Lower Egypt. Keep in mind that Egypt is below the equator so Lower Egypt is closest to the Mediterranean Sea and Upper Egypt is closer to Nubia, Ethiopia, or the origins of the Nile River. The *Hyksos are possibly a Hebrew people but NOT n the direct line of Jacob, rather from the blood lines of Peleg, Esau or Ishmael. Peleg is the 4th great-grandfather to Abraham. Esau (Arabs) and Ishmael (Arabs) are the cousins to the Israelites of today. All are a Hebrew people.

If I haven’t lost you in the tracing of these parallel histories, we see statistically that there is a very close fit with what the Bible records as history and what secular history records minus scripture. Yes, there will always be the doubters but it isn’t an honest rejection of history that is their platform for trying to alter history into his or her desired perception. It is their rejection of God and that He is the only judge of what was, is and is to come.

Wikipedia: Hyksos…

The Hyksos rulers of the fifteenth dynasty of Egypt were of non-Egyptian origin. Most archaeologists describe the Hyksos as a mix of Asiatic peoples, suggested by recorded names such as Khyan and Sakir-Har that resemble Asiatic names, and pottery finds that resemble pottery found in archaeological excavations in the area of modern Israel. The name Hyksos was used by the Egyptian historian Manetho (ca. 300 BC), who, according to the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (1st century AD), translated the word as “king-shepherds” or “captive shepherds”. Josephus himself identified the Hyksos with the Hebrews of decadency from any one of Abraham’s sons, but not Isaac of the Bible (See *Genesis 25:1-3). Hyksos was in fact probably an Egyptian term meaning “rulers of foreign lands” (heqa-khaset), and it almost certainly designated the foreign dynasts rather than a whole nation. The Hyksos kingdom was centered in the eastern Nile Delta and Middle Egypt and was limited in size, never extending south into Upper Egypt, which was under control by Theban-based rulers except for Thebes’s port city of Elim at modern Quasir. (emphasis mine)

This helps explain why a new king or Pharaoh in Egypt who did not know Joseph, suppressed the Israelites putting them in slavery to the State. (Italicized emphasis mine)

*Keturah bore Abraham 6 sons. Abraham told them to not mix with the offspring of Jacob and told them to go east. Keturah, possibly Egyptian, is thought by some Jewish scholars to be none other than Hagar. We know that Hagar was Egyptian. If by some chance these “invaders (Hyksos) from the east” (historian Menthos) were actually descendants from the six sons of Abraham and Keturah, they were simply returning to their ancient mother’s homeland; i.e. Egypt, but of mixed blood; part DNA would have been from Abraham.

Of course as I usually try to include in any fact based article I write, “Don’t take my word for it. Do some honest research of the truth, WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth.”

 

 

Fitness – Team Work – Playing the Game

jStark3Charles Spurgeon once stated: “A time will come when instead of shepherds feeding the sheep, the church will have clowns entertaining the goats (Spurgeon)”

What Charles Spurgeon said is serious and should *rock the membership of churches, church boards, pastor associations, and quite frankly… the graves of our founding fathers. Many, far too many churches have become lighthouse clubs instead of lighthouse stations. Meeting to entertain as Charles Spurgeon phrased it; not meeting to exercise our Christian duty, our spiritual gift(s) and to bring in the poor and needy souls from the neighborhood.

*At minimum it should disturb church boards enough to take inventory and assess their church goals and attitudes.

The Olympics, yes even those in London, 2012, can be a solid set of lessons for all God-centered churches and Kingdom Minded men and women. Every Olympian has three things in common:

1. They are physically fit and work at it daily.
2. They understand that they are part of a team
3. They know their role, team position and in what part of the Olympics they are qualified to compete.

No one can compete, that is, expect to be competitive, if s/he is not Physically fit to compete. It is all part of preparation for the event.  How does one prepare? Practice – practice – practice, but there is more too being prepared. I recall as a youngster joining the Boy Scouts of America. The Scout Motto, at least in the 1950’s was “Be Prepared”. We spent many a weekend and during our weekly scout meetings learning and preparing for life, survival skills, personal hygiene, respect for authority, listening then doing, exercising, and becoming prepared.

The Apostle Paul and others in the Bible use physical activity (sports) as an example of how we are to live the Christian life. A few examples include:

“I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith” (2 Timothy 4:7)

You were running the race well. Who cut in on you and stopped you from obeying the Truth”? (Galatians 5:7; ISV)

“Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us” (Heb. 12:1).

“Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may obtain it.” (1 Corinthians 9:24)

Sometimes rather than run the race we simply sit in the stands, sometimes cheer; even offering suggestions as to how the athlete or team could have done better. We sound like the expert but in reality have never left the rocking chair, pew, stadium benches or *quit somewhere along the way.

*Quitting? I recall the story about an Olympic runner from Britain in the 1992 Olympics.

Britain’s Derek Redmond had dreamed all his life of winning a gold medal in the 400-meter race, and his dream was in sight as he ran in the semifinals at the Barcelona Olympics of 1992. He was running the race of his life and was nearing the finish line when all of a sudden he felt a sharp pain go up the back of his leg. He fell face first onto the track with a torn right hamstring.

As the doctors were approaching, Redmond fought to his feet and began hopping to the finish line. When he reached the stretch, a large man in a T-shirt came out of the stands, brushed aside a security guard and ran to Redmond, embracing him. It was Jim Redmond, Derek’s father. “You don’t have to do this,” he told his weeping son. “Yes, I do,” said Derek. “Well, then,” said Jim, “We’re going to finish this together.”

And they did. Fighting off security men, the son’s head sometimes buried in his father’s shoulder, they stayed in Derek’s lane all the way to the end, as the crowd rose and clapped and wept.

Derek didn’t walk away with the gold medal, but he was a winner because he did His best. In a sense, he also didn’t “walk” away from his sense of duty to finish the race just as the Apostle Paul tells us in Galatians 5:7. Paul never intended his words in 1 Corinthians 9:4 to mean if we can’t win the prize, then give up. God measures us by our effort. Quitting, never getting out of the start gate or off the star-blocks is not an option.Finish Banner (clipping path included)

Go back to 2 Timothy 4:7. The Apostle Paul is speaking in the past-tense meaning he did his best while he could. We know from history that Paul would become one of the first Christian martyrs of the Roman Emperor Nero. Paul also knew that not only his career, but his life was about over. His race had been run. This is why he speaks in the past-tense in this verse. He didn’t quit. His race was over. He was in prison soon to be executed. He ran and hobbled at times to the very end.

The passage in 1 Corinthians 9:24 has been, and continues to be, used as an excuse by pew-dwellers to remain on the sidelines in our Christian living and the use of their Spiritual Gift within the local congregation. I must ask him or her to read 1 Corinthians chapters 12-14; Romans chapter 12; Ephesians chapter 4; and 1 Peter chapter 4. Each of these chapters tells us to USE our gift from the Holy Spirit while on earth; to live a life worth living; to be Kingdom Minded.

Being prepared or “fit” in a spiritual sense means to be studied in the Word and having a prayer life with both being daily exercises. Studied in the Word is much more than listening to a Sunday sermon or daily (hopefully at the minimum) devotions. Being studied means at minimum knowing the scriptures required to lead another lost soul to Christ and being a true lighthouse for God; a lighthouse that , like in Matthew 5:14 cannot be missed.

“Ye are the light of the world. A city set on a hill or mountainside cannot be hidden”.

The second common fact of all Olympians is that they understand that they are part of a team. The Olympian may be in a solo competition, but s/he did not get their alone. There are those who gave financial backing, moral support and let’s not forget the trainer(s). There are the members of the Olympic team who encourage and assist with another’s training when needed.

Christians have the same responsibility within the local church. We may not be the one actually running the race, but our spiritual gift may not be that particular role. But we have a role and that is not to be a spectator.

Here is my very brief point on TEAM WORK: It is possible for a church to get too dependent on pastors, and then we forget that we are really part of a team called the Body of Christ. If we think that the minister is the player, God is the coach, and the congregation is the crowd of spectators, we’ve got it wrong; very wrong and there is no scripture to support such a thought. In reality and as God/Christ ordained it, the whole congregation, those claiming to be believers, is the team, the pastor is the coach – God is the team owner and the local neighborhood and the world itself is the audience. I might suggest that the real question is – are you a member of the team?

If you are not a Christian; i.e. a member of the team (body of believers in Christ), you are not even in the race. You have no hope to stand in the victory circle to receive your crown of life. I encourage you to give your life to the Lord today, by *believing in Jesus, turn away from your sins, confessing your faith in Jesus and be baptized for the forgiveness of your sins.

*To believe that there is/was a Jesus, that there is/was a supreme being; i.e. God, is in itself is not enough. Even demons, fallen angels, believe there is a God, Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ (James 2:19). You will have eternity one way or the other. The only option is which eternity? Heaven or Hell? Blunt? Yes, but we are not talking about the Olympians at this moment. We are talking about your future… after death. Denial of such a thing changes nothing. If I am wrong, then that is it; it is all over. If you are wrong, well… eternity awaits your arrival, but which one?

Getting back on track; Christians are to be an active member of a local church body and team. We must use our spiritual gift within that local body of believers and let others use their spiritual gift(s). We are not all an eye or a foot, but we are all a functioning member of one body (1 Corinthians 12:12).

Occupying several square inches of a pew or seat in a local church, even if it is every week, is not a demonstration of our faith as true believers. James tries to make this clear in his Epistle by telling us that faith without works is dead. The word faith in the Greek, pistis, means to give credence to our claim; wearing the uniform of our team; using our Spiritual Gift(s) for the church/kingdom.

The word ‘dead’ in the Greek as written in James 2:17 is nekros. It means… It doesn’t really exist. I have a particular love for how the NIV writes it: “In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.”  In other words… our faith without works to demonstrate our faith is not very convincing to those around us (the audience) yet alone to our own being. Put in an Olympic or any other sport term, simply stating that one is on a team does not demonstrate that s/he really is on that team. Where is the evidence?

Christ gave up his human life as a sacrifice for our eternity with Him in Heaven. He is the only passage. John 14:6 and John 15:13 make this very clear. This may be a poor comparison of His sacrifice for us but I recall a news story from 1987:

On August 16, 1987, Northwest Airlines flight 225 crashed just after taking off from the Detroit airport, killing 155 people.
One survived: a four-year-old from Tempe, Arizona, named Cecelia. News accounts say when rescuers found Cecelia they did not believe she had been on the plane. Investigators first assumed Cecelia had been a passenger in one of the cars on the highway onto which the airliner crashed. But when the passenger register for the flight was checked, there was Cecelia’s name.

Cecelia survived because, even as the plane was falling, Cecelia’s mother, Paula Chican, unbuckled her own seat belt, got down on her knees in front of her daughter, wrapped her arms and body around Cecelia, and then would not let her go.
Nothing could separate that child from her parent’s love—neither tragedy nor disaster, neither the fall nor the flames that followed, neither height nor depth, neither life nor death.

Such is the love of our Savior for us. He left heaven, lowered himself to us, and covered us with the sacrifice of His own body to save us.

Finally, knowing our position on the team: Can one imagine the looks on the faces of fans, coaches and other Olympic competitors if Michael Phelps, the great USA Olympic swimmer, was seen lined up for the 1500 meter foot race or the pole vault? Neither sport is one for which he is qualified. We must know our position in Christ and within the local church body. As believers, we all have specific roles to play. However a foot is not an eye just as a great swimmer, though physically fit and wearing the uniform of the team he represents is not the one we want running the 1500 meter foot race or the pole vault. Neither are his or her gift or talent.

Bible study keeps us spiritually fit. The Apostle Paul tells us how to be a team. But as disciples on earth and the working body of Christ, God tells us what the game is and our role through the spiritual gift(s) of each believer. Alas, EVERY BELIEVER has what his and her responsibility to and in the Church… YOUR CHURCH. Don’t get caught up in image building responsibilities. One spiritual gift is not superior to another. The Apostle Paul writes on this but the passage in Matthew 6:1 comes to mind:
Be careful not to do your ‘acts of righteousness’ before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.”

Matthew, talking directly to the Jews at this point but inferring it to all, is saying, if we want the prime jobs of recognition in any church body so that others will oooh and awwww at our position, we have already been rewarded. God owes us nothing additional once in heaven.

Let me conclude this written message by citing something I recently read on the Internet published by Grace Communion International. I know little about them but in this following quote, they have it right.

“We have come to a greater awareness of the spiritual gifts God gives his people. We understand from Scripture some basic points:

• Every Christian believer has at least one spiritual gift, usually two or three.

• Every believer should be using his or her gifts to serve others in the church.

• No member has all the gifts, so we need each other.

• No [single] gift is given to all members of one local body/church. (emphasis mine)

• God decides who receives which gift(s).

Every member ought to be involved in some ministry, some area of service (“ministry” refers to all types of service, not just pastoral work). Every Christian should be using his or her gifts to serve others “for the common good” (1 Cor. 12:7; 1 Pet. 4:10)”.Support

In other words, our role (3rd point) on the team is to support one another.

-Dr. jStark

 

 

 

Amu – Hyksos – Shepherd Kings – Amalekites (Pharaohs)

In researching the subject of these Semite rulers of Egypt called Hyksos jStark3(Shepherd Kings) we found significant historic revision; i.e. convenience to deny the truth or support someone’s supposition. The name Hyksos is an Egyptian name that means shepherd kings (Hyk;shepherd, sos; kings). These people were hated and enslaved the indigenious people of Egypt. Rather than try to address all of the revisionist history recorded on the WEB and in many history books, let’s look at the facts. First, these people were known as foreign invaders; people who took control of pharaoh’s throne without a fight from Egypt’s legendary military(s). Even the History Channel in October of 2010 noted that these people moved in and set themselves up as rulers “WITHOUT OPPOSITION.”

Next, the Amu, Hyksos, Shepherd Kings and Amalekites are one and the same people. Even opposing historical views tend to agree on this fact. These people hated the Israelites as much as they hated their more powerful neighbors, the Egyptians. Egyptologists validate and verify this information. 

What might one find in the Bible that correlates with these fact? The Bible tells us that after 400 years of servitude, the by then very populous Israelites left Egypt under the leadership of Moses. 

Moses parting the Red SeaThe Bible tells us the story in The Book of Exodus about the Red Sea incident. The Israelites crossed the Red Sea on dry land and the sea waters returned to their basin when Pharaoh and his army tried to follow.

The Bible also tells us that the Israelites saw dead (drowned) Egyptian soldiers washed up on the shore. This would be to the EAST side of the Red Sea where the Amalekites lived. It doesn’t take a giant leap of brain power to expect that the Amalekites would also see the same thing since this was their side of the Red Sea. 

We also know that the Amalekites began an *age-old grudge battle with straggling Israelites. 1 ½ million people (Israelites) marching ten abreast would be a line that stretches 150 miles. Joshua was ordered by Moses to select trained men of war from the ranks of the Israelites, go to the back of the long line of Israelites, and deal with the Amalekite army. He defeated them and the Amalekites turned their attention to their real purpose, invading a leaderless and now powerless Egypt.Think about this… If Pharaoh and his entire army drowned in the Red Sea, and as the History channel “documentary” put it, the “Amu” moved in without resistance, they set themselves up as “the Hyksos; i.e. became hated Shepherd Kings.” Why were they hated? They enslaved the Egyptians just as the Egyptians had previously enslaved the Israelites. They stayed in power until 400 years later **King Saul of Israel attacked and defeated them [1 Samuel 15:7-8; 1 Chronicles 4:42-43]. This defeat allowed the Egyptians to re-install an Egyptian Pharaoh as ruler over lower and upper Egypt and became “morally obliged” to Israel.

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT: God tells us several times in the Bible that He will settle the score with those dispise Christians and those who curse Israel. Israel was enslaved by Egypt 400 years. After their ‘exodus” from Egypt, the Amu, Amalekites, Shepherd Kings, Hyksos, all the same people, enslaved the Egyptians for…  that’s right,400 years. Now you know the rest of the Bible story that secular history tries to revise or deny. 

* According to the Book of Genesis and 1 Chronicles, Amalek (Hebrew: עֲמָלֵק), was the son of Eliphaz and the grandson of Esau (Gen. 36:12; 1 Chr. 1:36); the chief of an Edomite tribe (Gen. 36:16). His mother was a Horite, a tribe whose territory the descendants of Esau had seized. [WikiPedia] 

** Israel was first ruled by Judges for 400 years. King Saul, anointed by the last judge of Israel, Samuel, became the first king of a unified Israel. 

Sources: Josephus, Menatho, Papyrus Ipuwer, Brugsch, & Velikovsky, Holy Scriptures, Wiersbe Bible Commentary

Author’s Extra Note: Keep in mind that not only did the ruling Pharaoh drown with his mounted and foot soldiers, his son had already died due to the tenth plague; i.e. the supposed next Pharaoh of Egypt. No one was left to officially take control of the Egyptian throne. The Amalekites simply moved into Egypt unapposed. Bear in mind that the Amalekites came into being through Esau, twin brother to Jacob, some 500 years earlier in history. This means they can be identified as Semites, but not Israelites. Contrary to history revisionists, Semites did set themselves up to rule over Egypt, but NOT the Israelite (Jacob’s) line. During the time the Amu ruled and enslaved the Egyptians, Israelites were busy setting up the nation of Israel, ruled by judges for their first 400 years as a nation. QUESTION FOR YOU: Who did God tell King Saul to attack shortly after becoming King of Israel? The answer is in the history book called the inspired Word of God… the Bible.

 

Did Joseph Do It To His Own People while in Egypt?

It Was Joseph’s Fault. The group of Jacob’s band of 70 to 80 people had moved to Egypt during the height of a 7 year famine that included surrounding lands. Archeological discoveries (re: Dr. Lennart Moeller in his book,The Exodus Case) record activities of a Imhotep, second ruler to the Pharaoh, that parallel in great detail the biblical records of Joseph.

It was during the “seven meager [inscription transliteration] years and seven rich years” as inscribed by order of Pharaoh Djsore, again in an inscription found in Sakara [Egypt] records [stone reliefs] of starving people and warehouses filled with grain we find these secular parallels to the biblical record of Joseph.

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

A side note and probable ahamoment in scripture and secular history: It is in Sakarra we find the “step pyramids” with the first one built as a tomb for none other than Pharaoh Djsore; Joseph’s Pharaoh. Make note of this as we unravel secular historical facts with biblical accounts of early Israelites and Egypt. Begin by recalling the biblical account of the famine, Joseph, his family moving, and why they were located and settled in Goshen, Egypt.

[Genesis 47] With Pharaoh Djsore’s blessing [Genesis 47:6-7] Joseph settles his family in Goshen, a land owned by the royalty. Pharaoh tells Joseph to “put those with special abilities to tend to his flocks.” It is also critical that we read verse 12: Joseph also “provided his father and his brothers and all of his father’s household with food.” Joseph’s family became employees of the Pharaoh and were given the same considerations as were the “priests of Egypt;” all but ownership of the land in Goshen where they settled [Genesis 47:22].

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

Genesis 47:13 begins some additional aha insight. The people’s food ran out, but not for the Israelites. They were employees of the Pharaoh, “watching over his livestock.” Verse 14 tells us that Joseph collected all the money [gold and silver of value] of Egypt and Canaan in exchange for food kept in the warehouses. When the money was all in Pharaoh’s coffers, “all Egypt”, which includes lands/peoples they had conquered, sold their *livestock to Joseph in exchange for food.

The Rest of the Story
It Was Joseph’s Fault. The group of Jacob’s band of 70 to 80 people had moved to Egypt during the height of a 7 year famine that included surrounding lands. Archeological discoveries (re: Dr. Lennart Moeller in his book,The Exodus Case) record activities of a Imhotep, second ruler to the Pharaoh, that parallel in great detail the biblical records of Joseph.

It was during the “seven meager [inscription transliteration] years and seven rich years” as inscribed by order of Pharaoh Djsore, again in an inscription found in Sakara [Egypt] records [stone reliefs] of starving people and warehouses filled with grain we find these secular parallels to the biblical record of Joseph.

Did Joseph Do It To His Own People while in Egypt?*Q: Who were now keepers of the Pharaoh’s livestock? [ans: the Israelites living in Goshen]

After another year goes by [Genesis 47:17] and people once again run out of food, they sell their lands to Joseph in exchange for grain and food supplies. Verse 47:20 tells us that “Joseph [then] bought all the land in Egypt for the Pharaoh”. This reduced the people to servitude to the Pharaoh; something similar to sharecroppers in American history. [NOTE: Up to this time the peoples of Egypt were NOT IN SERVITUDE to the pharaoh, pharaohs were not yet deities over the people but simply kings/rulers].

Verse 47:23 tells us “Joseph bought their lands.” Ultimately the people themselves voluntarily and gratefully [Genesis 47:25] sold themselves into slavery to the Pharaoh… Joseph put Egyptians into this position by his administration of the 7 years of plenty then the 7 years of famine.

The Sphinx and Pyramid of Khafre, Cairo, EgyptHow did the pharaohs find the people to build the pyramids? Egyptians had sold themselves into servitude and slavery to Pharaoh; he had all the laborers he needed. It is during this dynasty of Egypt, the step-pyramids” were first built. Secular accounts of Egyptians as well as Israelites helped build the pyramids are correct, but now we know how and why.

• Joseph interpreted Pharaoh’s dreams [Genesis 41]

• Joseph became second in power only to Pharaoh; Genesis 41:40. [Did you ever wonder how Potifer must have felt about this time? He was the one who had imprisoned Joseph without a trial]

• Joseph came up with the plan for Egypt [41:33-36]

• It was during this time of plenty that Joseph married and had two sons [Genesis 41:50].

• It was during the time of the famine that Joseph’s family moved to Egypt and become employees of the Pharaoh with the benefit of food allotments.

• Joseph exchanges food stored in Pharaoh’s warehouses; first for money, then gold and silver articles, then livestock that were taken to Goshen for Joseph’s family to shepherd, then the private lands throughout Egypt, finally the very lives of the people of Egypt. [47:14-25]

• Joseph finally gives the people “seed to plant” as he knew the years of famine were about to end. But before others realized it, he exacted a “tithe/tribute” of 20% for Pharaoh.

What does all this mean? Up to this point in secular records, a pharaoh was not all-powerful or deemed a deity. Once Joseph reduced the people and land to servitude [Genesis 47:21] pharaohs began building temples and pyramids to themselves. Secular records give credit to Imhotep [Joseph’s Egyptian name] for designing the step-pyramid built for Djsore’s burial; AN OVERVIEW OF SAQQARA PROPER IN EGYPT by Alan Winston; the first of the great pyramids. Pharaoh’s beginning with Djsore had all the laborers they needed for such tasks as pyramid building.

Pharaoh Djsore and history records tell us that at this same time Egypt reached its zenith of wealth and power.

Is it any wonder why in Exodus 1:8 a pharaoh came to power who did not know (appreciate) the wonders performed by the Administrator Joseph. What he did realize, however, all but the Israelites were in servitude to the pharaoh? The people of Egypt were delighted to “help” subject these “intruders from Canaan” to slavery and begin to brutalize them.

So… did the eventual servitude of Israelites in Egypt result from Joseph’s actions? Did the actions of Joseph set the stage for Pharaohs to claim ownership of all therefore becoming deities? This is the Rest of the Bible Story; you decide.

jStark3

…tell the disciples AND Peter

Mark 16:7 can be read, overlooked, folded into the rest of this historical fact or be a bewilderment. Easter Sunday 2015 this passage jumped out at me. I waited for the pastor to address this curious comment that opens verse 7, but he didn’t. My option was simple but not easily done. Dig it out for myself.

Here is what Mark 16:7 says (NIV) But go, tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you.

Hmmm? Tell his disciples AND Peter?? The last contact Peter had with Jesus and as recorded within the Holy Scriptures (Bible) was when he was with him in the Garden of Gethsemane then followed him from afar off. That very evening Peter denied three times that he even knew this person now in the hands of authorities.

Think about this. You or I suddenly find our best friend in the hands of authorities for crimes against society. The mobs are loud and many are hanging around the courtyard. Then, people start pointing to either of us trying to tie us with the “friend” who is in custody. How would you react if you suspect knowing him yet alone being a close associate of his will also incriminate you? Peter was in this position. Now assume that the incriminated “friend” was somehow released. Would you be even slightly surprised if this “friend” looked at you the same as previously? How would you feel knowing that you had recently denied any association with this person at the time of his or her arrest?

Soldiers_24_AfgLet’s get very contemporary. You are hiking across the war-torn ISIS territory. You and a Christian friend are suddenly surrounded by obviously armed Jihadists and radicals. They ask one question of your friend; “Are you Christian?” Your friend says “YES” and they shoot or behead him on the spot. Then their attention turns to you. Having witnessed this atrocity they begin by asking you or me the same question, but the friend is no longer there; you or I are alone…”Are you Christian” they demand? Might we even hide behind a false fact that we met this guy somewhere while hiking but don’t really know the guy? Perhaps we might simply deny knowing him.

This is similar to the position in which Peter finds himself. It excuses nothing but highly suggests you or I severed our relationship with this arrested person. In the recorded historical fact of Jesus Christ’s crucifixion, Peter had verbally severed his relationship with Jesus by denying he even knew him.

Now it is after the fact. Jesus was buried and the disciples were cowering trying to decide what to do now… perhaps distance themselves from this crucified person and go back to fishing? But, this article is about Peter and why Jesus, after his resurrection and as recorded here in the Book of Mark, tells these women to go and tell the disciples AND Peter.

I could easily get lost in other facts as recorded in Matthew 28:1-15, the Roman guards saw the events of the resurrection earthquake (v2), the angel appearing (v2) the bribing of the guards by the Jewish leadership (12), and the fact that they were told to tell the authorities if questioned that Jesus’ disciples came and stole his body in the night while they slept. [BIG PROBLEM] Roman guards who fall asleep while on duty is punishable by death. Josh McDowell’s book Evidence That Demands A Verdict we learn the following from McDowell’s many and varied sources…

The guard numbered from ten to thirty men……they were not the kind of men to jeopardize their Roman necks by sleeping on their post…they were Roman soldiers, not mere Jewish temple guards…The soldiers had very strict discipline…the punishment for deserting one’s post was death…the fear of punishments produced faultless attention to duty, especially in the night watches…refusing to protect an officer was punishable by death…one soldier who had fallen asleep on duty was executed by being hurled from the cliff of the Capitolium… (pp 218 – 224)

If the guards were in fact asleep, how would they know that it wasn’t the local peoples who came and stole Christ’s body from the grave; they were asleep. Right? The same is true even if it was one guard at the grave-site.

…back to Peter.

Why didn’t the Lord single out any of the other disciples such as the doubter Thomas? Why? Because Peter was guilty of a sin that was so serious that he certainly figured he was no longer in good standing with the Lord, or even considered a follower of Jesus upon which his salvation hung in the balance.

To answer this question and what many ask ourselves even today, let me direct you to Matthew 12:31: “every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven (when confessed), but blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will NOT be forgiven” [emphasis mine]. But don’t stop at verse 31. It gets even more comforting when we read the next couple of verse:

32“Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man [Jesus], it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.

This is precisely the situation Peter finds himself. He denied the “son of man Jesus” three times. Verse 32 tells us such a sin can and will be forgive (if confessed; also see Mark 3:28; Luke 12:10; emphasis mine) Even Judas could have been forgiven if he confessed his betrayal of Jesus. Jesus separated out Peter to assure him he was still well within the grace of God. As Jesus told so many that he healed…go and sin no more.

Murphy James (4/13/2015).
ahabiblemoments. WordPress contributor

Who Are The Israelite’s?

Most today ascribe the New Testament to the life of Christ, his disciples, the Apostles and the early development of the Christian church. Few today, however, understand that the early Christian church was allowed to develop under the eyes and protection of the Romans. Roman officials viewed this new christianity movement as a cult or branch of Judaism.Today in our ignorance we refer to modern Israel as “Jews”. This is so even from our church pulpits. This isn’t quite accurate. Jews when mentioned in the Bible are distinct from members of the other Tribes of Israel.First of all, there were 12 Tribes of Israel; 13 if you count the equal blessing given to Joseph’s two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, by Jacob [Genesis 48: 12-16]. Judah is one tribe.

The Bible does not refer to the Jews meaning all of the Tribes of Israel. In fact, in the Hebrew there are those who descend from Judah (Yahudah) and those “others” who come from the land of Judah but are not Tribal Jews. 

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

What is the “aha moment”? All Jews are Israelites but not all Israelites are Jews. All Israelites are Hebrew (Semite) but not all Hebrews are Israelites. This strongly suggests that the modern country of Israel is but a small representation of the original Tribes of Israel. 

Who are the other Hebrews? They are the descendants of Ishmael [Arabs], Esau [Edomites, sometimes referred to as “dirty Arabs”], the six sons [today’s identity?] of Abraham and Ketu’rah and Joktan, one of the two sons of EberGenesis 10:25

All those belonging to the Tribes of Israel are Hebrew, but not all Hebrews [Semite] are Israelites. Arabs are also Hebrew; i.e descendants of Abraham. All Jews are Israelites but not all Israelites are from the Tribe or country of ancient Judah. Jews [Yehudah] are from the Tribe of Judah.Judaism is a religion, not a sect or race of people. Go back to Table of Nations in Genesis 10 to get the peoples straight in one’s mind. [see below from Wikipedia]
DoEber (עֵבֶר, Standard Hebrew Éver, Tiberian Hebrew ʻĒḇer)…[Wikipedia]…is an ancestor of the Israelites, according to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10-11 and 1 Chronicles 1.Eber was a great-grandson of Noah’s son Shem. He was the father of Peleg born when Eber was 34 years old, and of Joktan, Eber’s other son; i.e. a distant blood line relative of Abraham through Shem (Semites).

According to the Hebrew Bible, Eber died at the age of 464 (Genesis 11:14-17) when Jacob was 20. Abraham – Issac and Jacob: Do the simple math. This means that Eber was still alive after these three patriarchs of the Israelites were still walking on the earth.

Too often skeptics say that word-of-mouth history loses so much in the translation. Considering these facts about Eber’s life-span, there is little “pass it on” loss when information is handed down first-hand.

Eber lived 464 years (Genesis 11:14-17)
…Peleg
…Reu
…Serug
…Nahor
… Terah
… Abraham
… Isaac
… Jacob (Jacob is the father of the 12 sons/Israelites)

Following Genesis 10, nations of the world, Eber was living when Jacob was born.

There is an ancient legend that the Avars of Central Asia are descendants of Abraham through his last wife, *Ketu’rah [*see article in this publication]. If this is so, than these people(s) are descendants of Eber [see article to the left] through his great (5 times) grandson Abraham.Many scholars point to the name Eber as the root from where the name HEBREW comes. Linguistics link the Avars to an Oghur Turkic group of peoples. They originally settled in present-day Turkey.Over history many different groups of people settled in Turkey just as they did in Greece. What we see in modern history is “the last group” of people to settle and dominate these areas. Remnants of former peoples remain.

Travel Photos of  Israel - Jerusalem Western WallThe story between the stories… If all descended from Noah and his three sons, the global population expanded over the centuries from a centralized geography. This includes the Avars. We must also consider to where the Assyrians moved the 10 captive tribes of Israel after they overran the northern Israelites in 700’s B.C.

We can’t end one population of 7 or 8 million people without beginning another history of people someplace else. It is hard to hide millions of transplanted Israelites without a new group of people popping up somewhere.

Something to consider if one thinks that the Bible and history are distinctly separate.

They aren’t!!!!

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob probably knew Eber. Information and knowledge didn’t need to go from Eber through multiple generations of folklore. Eber was still alive during at least part of the life span of these three patriarchs. They probably heard God’s stories from Eber first-hand. Also consider the fact that Shem, one of Noah’s three Ark-bound sons lived 600 years. He was barely 100 years old when the Great Flood happened. He lived another 500 years AFTER the Great Flood [Genesis 11:10,11]Aha anyone? Now you know the Rest of this Bible Story.jStark3

The Apple Falls Close to Tree!

The Rest of the Bible Story:

In Genesis 20 we find the story of Abraham and Abimelech, a Philistine ruler. Abilelech was a some what common sir-name for several Philistine rulers. It means “father/leader of a king; my father/leader; a king.”

As the story reads, Abraham encounters Abimelech over Sarah, Abraham’s wife. She was beautiful and something to be desired even at 90 years of age. Abraham, supposedly fearing for his life since he lived in the land of Abimelech and knew of Abimelech’s designs on Sarah, told everyone that Sarah was his sister amd instructed her to say the he was her brother. This was not a total lie as Sarah was Abraham’s half-sister. The sin was in the “kavanah” of Abraham’s heart when he made this statement. He intended to deceive Abilelech.

Abilelech took Sarah fully intending on making her his wife. In a dream God revealed to Abilelech that Sarah was also Abraham’s wife. [note that a half-truth is reviled by God just as is a total lie]. God intervened in a dream to Abimelech. As Abilelech put it to Abraham, “What have you done to us? What was your reason for doing this?” [NIV]. In essence God had told Abilelech “You are as good as dead for this deed” [Genesis 20:3b].

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

Aha #1: Find in verse 20:7 (Genesis) that God identified Abraham as “a prophet.”

Now turn to Genesis 26:1-33. Enter stage left; Abraham and Sarah’s son Isaac. Due to a famine, Isaac moves to the same area as did his father [Abraham] many years earlier (above history note). Isaac states that Rebekah, his wife, is really his sister, as he is worried that the Philistines will otherwise kill him in order to marry Rebekah. After a while, Abimelech spots Isaac sporting with Rebekah and concludes she must be Isaac’s wife, not his sister.

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

Aha #2: As done between Abraham and Abilelech, , Abilelech seeks a nonaggression treaty between him and Isaac. The difference between these two similar incidents is Abraham feared for his life due to the fact he was in a strange land of mighty people. With Isaac, Abimelech feared Isaac for Isaac had become very wealthy and powerful. Abimelech “clearly saw that the Lord was with him.” Of course we do have the common denominator of both Abraham and Isaac lied about their wives. Another difference is that Isaac’s lie was not a half-truth. It was a lie!

Cart full of apples after picking in orchard

The apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

Future Aha Moments article: Note in Genesis 26:32-33 that Isaac named the well his servants had dug “Shibah”; Beersheba.. Beer means well and Sheba [shibah] means water; Beersheba. Over 500 years later, 42,000 soldiers of a Tribe of (Isaac) Israel were slaughtered because they couldn’t say the letters “sh” [shibboleth].

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

Aha #3: The treaties made between Abimelech and Abraham/Isaac were made between Philistines and future Israelites. Might you recall the problems Israel had with the Philistines hundreds of years later when Israel became a great nation? Did the Philistines of these latter years no longer “clearly see that the Lord was with them?” [J.I.V.] We can’t ask America to wake up, but we can challenge Christians to wake up. Does America see that “the Lord is clearly with us as Christians?”

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

Aha #4: Verses 34 and 35 is the only place in the Bible where a major “family in-law” issue between Esau and his parents, Isaac and Rebekah, is specifically identified; almost out of context per the 26th chapter of Genesis. What might be your introspective view [Y.I.V.]?

jStark3

The Law Of Averages

The Law of Averages: …”real theorem that a random variable will reflect its underlying probability over a very large sample.”

This theorem is used in many areas of life, some for good and some not so good. None the less, it is called a LAW of averages; over time certain things will average out. We are looking at the populations of the earth today in comparison to the beginning of mankind after the Great Flood; Noah and his three sons: Japheth, Shem and Ham. They started as equal in numbers and over time, the count of their offspring will still average out to something on par with their beginning ratio.

What’s the point? We tend to incorrectly view the Jewish population today as representative of all of the Tribes of Israel when in fact they were only one of the *thirteen tribes to move into the lands promised to them by God himself; Tribe of Judah [yehudah/jews]. Due to this misunderstanding, well-meaning people tend to equate this with the whole of the Hebrew population.

The Aha Moment? Using the Law of Averages (probability theory, expected value, etc) this means that the number of Jews in Israel, New York and the rest of the world is but a small percentage of the total count [“…as the sands of the seas,” Genesis 32:12]. Since these peoples began as descendants of Shem, one of Noah’s three sons, factoring in the global count of people and the Law of Averages, there is valid reason to believe there are 2 billion Hebrews on earth today. So who are they even if they don’t know who they are? Think about it? 1/3 of the world’s population!

AHA MOMENT

AHA MOMENT

. All Israelites are Hebrew but not all Hebrews are Israelites. Don’t forget the Arabs through Ishmael, the Edomites/Idumaeans through Esau and Ket’urah/Abraham’s six sons; all are Hebrew.

Simply put: All Jews are Israelites; all Israelites are Hebrew; all Arabs are Hebrew; All descendants of Ket’urah are Hebrew. all of these people carry Abraham’s DNA.

*13 Tribes of Israel in the Promised Land: http://www.uhcg.org/Lost-10-Tribes/13-Tribes-of-Israel.html

jStark3